WebFeb 25, 2024 · 1 Answer Sorted by: 1 Your unit test doesn't make sense. You explicitly invoke a function and test if it was really called. In your case, legendItemClick returns a value, hence you should check the result of … WebOct 3, 2024 · I can write a test that fails if this line is not present, however, it itself does not convince code coverage from Jest to complain. Specifically, it says about that line: statement not covered function not covered node.js express jestjs istanbul Share Improve this question Follow edited Oct 4, 2024 at 6:27 Lin Du 78.6k 75 248 440
unit testing - Why Karma Coverage is showing "statement not …
WebNov 29, 2024 · It is not reactive Your approach takes out the reactive part and introduces an imperative approach with mutual state on an asynchronous operation. Keep it reactive and make your code … WebSep 15, 2024 · 1 The uncovered setter is code that would be exercised if you set a value of the class property. You don't have any test code that does this. You're only getting a … compatibility mode ie 11
code coverage - Identify what parts of a function are not covered by
WebJun 10, 2024 · In computer science, test coverage is a measure used to describe the degree to which the source code of a program is executed when a particular test suite runs. Code coverage is usually used as a quality metric for software eg. “Our code has to have 80%+ test coverage”. Gathering test coverage with Jest is as simple as using the --coverage ... WebNov 9, 2024 · I have this all over my application: I have a well covered function, however it says "branch not covered" on async function part in test coverage report generated by Istanbul after runnin... WebWho would NOT be considered a covered entity under HIPAA? ABN What form is provided to a patient to indicate a service may not be covered by Medicare and the patient may be responsible for the charges? Only individuals whose job requires it may have access to protected health information. compatibility mode help